Similar cannon from a shipwreck with IEC markings
And as it turned out, one of the five out of twenty five cannons found on the shipwreck that had been fully cleaned and examined also contained the master founder’s mark “IEC”. “IEC” was embossed on the face of the right trunnion of one of the cannons! The report claimed that this indicated that the gun was produced at the Ehrendal foundry in Sweden.
Hmmm, so let’s read on:
“Jesper Eliaeson started the
Ehrendal foundry as early as 1689 and was master founder until his death in
1722. Thomas Roth, head of research at the Army Museum in Stockholm, Sweden states,
“As far as we know the mark “IE” (for Jasper Eliaeson) was used on one of the
trunnions from 1689 to 1695 but it is possible that the mark could have been
altered after that year until 1722 when his son Olof, began using “OEC” (Roth
2004). The addition of the “C” to Jesper’s mark may have coincided with his
1695 ennoblement by the Swedish monarchy, and subsequent surname change from
Eliaeson to Ehrencreutz (Jobling 1990). A sixty pounder mortar in the
Tojhusmuseet in Copenhagen has IEC on the right trunnion and 1721 on the left,
indicating its manufacture one year before Jesper Ehrencreutz’s death (Brown
2005).”
"1 7 5 1"?
I just had to go back at once to the three cannons,
particularly the best preserved one to check if it was possible to move the
object to check for markings on the left trunnion. That part was almost
touching the ground and just an inch away from the baby cannon and it was not
possible for me to move the gun even an inch as it was extremely heavy.
Engr. Luna "Pongkoy" Manrique (MPDC), happened to be standing at the Casa’s
main door when I got there this afternoon, he said “Hi” and I said “Hi” and asked him if he
could help me with something, pointing my finger at the sleeping artillery. “Am
checking on marks on these objects”, I said, “found some letters on the right
trunnion, but couldn’t move it to be able to check the left trunnion, that
should indicate the year it was manufactured”, I matter-of-factly stated.
The engineeer probably also got too excited himself as he at once made an effort to move the cannon in question just by himself, but he was a big man, and
voila!
The left trunnion was marked with numbers! It wasn’t so clean but the
numbers “1”, “7”, and what appeared like “5”, and a clear number “1” were quite visible. That's the casting date! So that discovery could
nicely indicate, for now at least, and this claim should be considered
preliminary, that the said cannon was probably produced in 1751. Certainly subject to further examination.
The two other cannons will have to be cleaned very carefully to
check on their individual markings. I have taken photos of the
other artillery’s trunnions for further investigation but couldn't see much with the result I got.
I thought of asking Engr. Manrique if he thought the baby cannon in
the middle was made of bronze, telling him that the report I came across stated that
small caliber artillery in those days were typically produced in bronze. “That
could be bronze, but I really could not be certain”, he said.
Then the Boac Engineer related to me that he has personally
inspected the artillery at Intramuros to check how well the Intramuros
Administration has managed to preserve those mounted or loose Spanish cannons there. Others he has seen elsewhere were even kept
in glass casings. “Yes, it would, of course, be interesting to construct
carriages for these pieces”, I said, “maybe of hardwood or a mix of wood and concrete?” He
said the Municipal Government of Boac under Mayor Bert Madla has a fairly good
idea about what to do with the cannons of Boac, where they should find
permanent place in the plaza, etc. They are all starkly aware of their cultural, historical
and touristic value. “That would come next, na but may not be rushed!”, he added.
And as to the question, how did the cannons get there in the first place? The report said:
“The two largest producers of cast iron
artillery in the last half of the 17th century and throughout the 18th
century were England and Sweden. (Frantzen 2004). Ordnance exports from both
countries were prevalent throughout Europe and anywhere Europeans traded. The
reality is that the international ordnance trade was so complex that once guns
left the foundry they could end up on ships of any nationality”.
Naturalmente, there were many Spanish ships
that ruled our part of the world in those days.
So, as far as the two other cannons are concerned, they may still be very
British or Swedish in origin and those things will certainly be known by the
curious, like you and me, in no time at all.
So next time you see those cannons, you know they have more stories to tell.
|