Those intriguing cannons of Boac
Similar cannon from a shipwreck with IEC markings (above)
|
“Jesper Eliaeson started the Ehrendal foundry as early as
1689 and was master founder until his death in 1722. Thomas Roth, head of
research at the Army Museum in Stockholm, Sweden states, “As far as we know the
mark “IE” (for Jasper Eliaeson) was used on one of the trunnions from 1689 to
1695 but it is possible that the mark could have been altered after that year
until 1722 when his son Olof, began using “OEC” (Roth 2004). The addition of
the “C” to Jesper’s mark may have coincided with his 1695 ennoblement by the
Swedish monarchy, and subsequent surname change from Eliaeson to Ehrencreutz
(Jobling 1990). A sixty pounder mortar in the Tojhusmuseet in Copenhagen has
IEC on the right trunnion and 1721 on the left, indicating its manufacture one
year before Jesper Ehrencreutz’s death (Brown 2005).”
"1 7 5 1"?
I just had to go back at once to the three cannons,
particularly the best preserved one to check if it was possible to move the
object to check for markings on the left trunnion. That part was almost
touching the ground and just an inch away from the baby cannon and it was not
possible for me to move the gun even an inch as it was extremely heavy.
Engr. Luna "Pongkoy" Manrique (MPDC), happened to
be standing by the Casa’s main door when I got there this afternoon, he said
“Hi” and I said “Hi” and asked him if he could help me with something, pointing
my finger at the sleeping artillery.
“Am checking on marks on these objects”, I said, “found some
letters on the right trunnion, but couldn’t move it to be able to check the
left trunnion, that should indicate the year it was manufactured”, I
matter-of-factly stated.
The engineeer probably also got too excited himself as he at
once made an effort to move the cannon in question just by himself, but he was
a big man, and voila!
The left trunnion was marked with numbers! It wasn’t so
clean but the numbers “1”, “7”, and what appeared like “5”, and a clear number
“1” were quite visible. That's the casting date! So that discovery could nicely
indicate, for now at least, and this claim should be considered preliminary,
that the said cannon was probably produced in 1751. Certainly subject to
further examination.
The two other cannons will have to be cleaned very carefully
to check on their individual markings. I have taken photos of the other
artillery’s trunnions for further investigation but couldn't see much with the
result I got.
“Yes, it would, of course, be interesting to construct
carriages for these pieces”, I said, “maybe of hardwood or a mix of wood and
concrete?” He said the Municipal Government of Boac under Mayor Bert Madla has
a fairly good idea about what to do with the cannons of Boac, where they should
find permanent place in the plaza, etc. They are all starkly aware of their
cultural, historical and touristic value. “That would come next, na but may not
be rushed!”, he added.
And as to the question, how did the cannons get there in the
first place? The report said:
“The two largest producers of cast iron artillery in the
last half of the 17th century and throughout the 18thcentury were England and
Sweden. (Frantzen 2004). Ordnance exports from both countries were prevalent
throughout Europe and anywhere Europeans traded. The reality is that the
international ordnance trade was so complex that once guns left the foundry
they could end up on ships of any nationality”.
Naturalmente, there were many Spanish ships that ruled our
part of the world in those days. So, as
far as the two other cannons are concerned, they may still be very British or
Swedish in origin and those things will certainly be known by the curious, like
you and me, in no time at all.
So next time you see those cannons, you know they have more
stories to tell.
- Eli J. Obligacion, Marinduque Rising, first posted June 8,
2012